• Home
  • Cars
  • Why debase a satisfying source of interaction like a car door handle?
Image

Why debase a satisfying source of interaction like a car door handle?


There are other kinds, of course, such as the ‘flappy’ ones. The classic. It’s nice to see these making a comeback on the latest Polestars, Minis and a few Porsches, because they are, at least, still moving handles with a physical action. Some of them have to ‘pop out’ electronically before being pulled (and that’s another can of worms), but some of them don’t.

You’ve also got ‘spindly’ ones that sit flat to the door until you press on one end in order to make the other stand proud enough to get a hold of it (Kia EV6, Nissan GT-R). Elegant but a strangely unsatisfying and fiddly designer’s solution, surely, rather than an engineer’s.

Now we also have flappy ones that aren’t actually flappy ones but instead just hand-shaped cavities with a microswitch inside. The Volkswagen ID 7 has them; so do the BMW i7, Fiat 500 and Maserati Granturismo. They’re solid-feeling in one sense, because you’re literally pulling directly on the door panel, but there’s no haptic handle action, just the tiny electronic flick of a release button. Eurgh.

Then there are the hidden ones. The Lotus Evija has a release button squirrelled away in an aero scoop; TVRs used to use a button on the door mirror. Remember the McLaren MP4-12C? You actually had to stroke the door panel just so to get it to open (although they did add a physical button later). I could have wasted hours working out exactly how to get into these cars. I might still be there now.

Worse still, I was once marooned in a wet and cold Welsh quarry for most of an afternoon, locked out of a running Range Rover Evoque, waiting for a man with a crowbar to turn up – all because of a ‘fancy’ motorised door handle. That’s a long story involving a good deal of stupidity on my part and a demanding photographer, but the door handle ultimately caused it.

So why do it? Why mess with something so simple that works so well? Why debase a lovely, satisfying haptic source of interaction with needless electromechanical twattery?

Here’s hoping we’ve passed the nadir of it all and that car makers start listening to firefighters again.



Source link

Releated Posts

The best MPVs and people carriers – driven and tested

When reviewing MPVs, we look past the boxy silhouettes to find the vehicles that truly make life easier.…

ByByTDSNEWS999 Mar 12, 2026

Mini Cooper S vs Skoda Fabia 130: Last call for warm hatches?

Compared with the Mini, you’re sat a little high and upright, although that’s simply closer to the norm…

ByByTDSNEWS999 Mar 12, 2026

Alfa Romeo GTV: a humble Fiat hatchback turned into a 150mph star

The base metal wasn’t so promising. A platform that started life beneath the boxily functional, galvanised bodywork of…

ByByTDSNEWS999 Mar 11, 2026

A110 EV still Alpine’s focus but ICE variant adds ‘growth possibilities’

The next-generation Alpine A110 could be fitted with a combustion engine, brand boss Philippe Krief has confirmed –…

ByByTDSNEWS999 Mar 11, 2026