• Home
  • Cars
  • The biggest loser of the pay-per-mile EV tax? The government
Image

The biggest loser of the pay-per-mile EV tax? The government


The biggest loser from the UK government’s expected introduction of ‘pay-per-mile’ road pricing as a way of taxing electric vehicles will ultimately be the government itself.

While in the short term it is very much car makers that need a rapid acceleration in EV sales (as they are on the hook for fines for missing sales targets set out in the government’s ZEV mandate), in the long term it is the government that will face legal action if it fails in its pledge for the UK to be net-zero by 2050.

This is what all of its EV policies are ultimately tied into. The UK committed to be net-zero for carbon emissions by 2050, and it introduced a ban on the sale of non-electric vehicles by 2035 as part of that. Given cars tend to stay on the road for around 15 years in the UK, the theory is the UK car parc will be largely EV by 2050, and cars will have done their bit in reducing emissions for the government in its legally binding net-zero pledge.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ latest taxation policy would be, if introduced, the latest in a series of contradictory head-scratchers from successive governments in their approaches to EVs.

This will hurt still fragile consumer confidence in EVs and risks undermining their continued uptake. Putting any notion of the fairness or cost of the tax aside, simply having the additional tax in place is a barrier to their adoption and gives hesitant prospective EV buyers another reason to delay the switch the government needs them to make.

All of this comes at a time when EV uptake is increasing, following the government’s introduction of the Electric Car Grant (ECG), which gives up to £3750 off the price of qualifying EVs. Last month, the market share of EVs increased by almost five percentage points year on year to 25.4% – a figure that, with various credits and small print in the ZEV mandate scheme, will put the industry on track for compliance.

Next year, the market share needs to be at 33%, so momentum needs to be maintained – but road pricing will hit consumer confidence, causing future crashes.



Source link

Releated Posts

“No excess”: This ‘EV Stratos’ shows China cares about enthusiasts

More evidence that car people are the same the world over. In the way that some Chinese engineers…

ByByTDSNEWS999 Mar 14, 2026

Cybertruck hits the UK: Can EV beast win over London’s car fans?

You might have read about sightings of a strange alien craft on Wimbledon Common earlier this month. For…

ByByTDSNEWS999 Mar 14, 2026

Leiters’ challenge: reshaping Porsche for a different world

Present-day Porsche was built for a world that no longer exists, a world in which trade was largely…

ByByTDSNEWS999 Mar 13, 2026

Thirsty work: Fixing the most annoying thing on my Alpine A290

“A large black Americano, please,” I cheerily say to the woman at the till. “To go!” I add…

ByByTDSNEWS999 Mar 13, 2026