Image

Perplexity quietly shared private user info, lawsuit says


Two Android phones, one showing the Perplexity logo and another showing the Google logo.

Joe Maring / Android Authority

TL;DR

  • An anonymous user has filed a proposed class action suit against Perplexity, Google, and Meta for alleged mishandling of private info.
  • The suit accuses Perplexity of sending chat content to Google and Meta for purposes of ad tracking without obtaining user consent.
  • It’s early days in this case, but penalties could be steep at $5,000 or more per violation.

Perplexity and other tech companies are in hot water for allegedly violating users’ privacy. A proposed class action filed by an anonymous Perplexity user this week accuses the AI firm of sharing sensitive information with both Google and Meta without user consent, even information entered into Perplexity’s ostensibly privacy-focused Incognito Mode.

As Ars Technica reports, the suit accuses Perplexity of using ad trackers from both Google and Meta without disclosing those integrations to users, comparing the low-profile trackers to wiretaps. User information gathered from Perplexity interactions is shared with both other companies, the complaint alleges, in order to target ads based on that info.

Don’t want to miss the best from Android Authority?

google preferred source badge light@2xgoogle preferred source badge dark@2x

The suit says that initial prompts entered into Perplexity by users signed into Perplexity accounts are always fed into Google’s and Meta’s ad platforms, and so are any reply options the user clicks on throughout the interaction. In the case of users who aren’t signed in, “the entire conversation may be accessed by third parties like Meta and Google.”

Data shared with Google and Meta by Perplexity allegedly includes personally identifiable information, regardless of whether that information was entered into Perplexity’s Incognito Mode (which the suit calls a “sham”).

In addition to accusing Perplexity of sharing identifiable information with third parties, the suit also says that Perplexity doesn’t require users to agree to its privacy policy before using its service, and that finding that policy at all is rather difficult: it’s not linked to from the Perplexity web app.

The anonymous complainant says that he used Perplexity for a variety of sensitive purposes, including to obtain financial and legal advice.

Google and Meta are also targeted in the suit, which accuses the companies of neglecting to enforce their own policies that may have prevented their trackers from being deployed in this way.

The proposed class that could eventually be eligible for compensation would include some Perplexity users in the US whose chats were shared with Google and Meta between late 2022 and early 2026. Damages in the suit could be steep, Ars reports, potentially exceeding $5,000 per each individual violation, of which there may be millions.

Thank you for being part of our community. Read our Comment Policy before posting.



Source link

Releated Posts

Apple releases new iOS 26.5 beta 1 build for iPhone

iOS 26.5 beta 1 arrived earlier this week for developers, but Apple has just shipped an updated beta…

ByByTDSNEWS999 Apr 3, 2026

The workout-ready Powerbeats Fit buds drop to their best price yet

Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority The prospect of warmer weather might have you thinking about getting outside more…

ByByTDSNEWS999 Apr 3, 2026

M5 MacBook Pro, Apple Sport Band, Nomad cases, more 9to5Mac

Today’s 9to5Toys Lunch Break is headlined by the most affordable new 2026 M5 Pro MacBook Pro at $149…

ByByTDSNEWS999 Apr 3, 2026

Samsung has a fix for your Galaxy S26 Ultra’s blurry photos

Ryan Haines / Android Authority TL;DR Some Galaxy S26 Ultra users have been experiencing blurry photos when shooting…

ByByTDSNEWS999 Apr 3, 2026