• Home
  • Phones
  • Proposed FCC ISP labeling changes sound a bit anti-consumer
Image

Proposed FCC ISP labeling changes sound a bit anti-consumer


Router ports with Ethernet cables plugged in

Rita El Khoury / Android Authority

TL;DR

  • The FCC is looking to eliminate some of its broadband labeling requirements for ISPs.
  • Broadband “nutrition” labels were introduced to make it easier for consumers to compare prices and services, fees inclusive.
  • The FCC teases further interest in backpedaling on labeling requirements it believes “provide minimal benefit to consumers.”

When you’re signing up for internet access, how confident are you about what your bill’s actually going to look like? ISPs and cellular carriers both have a reputation for positively opaque billing practices, piling on fees and passing taxes along to end users. As a consequence, responsible lawmakers pushed for legislation aimed at simplifying bills, and forcing ISPs to be upfront and clear about all their fees. But right now, current FCC leadership is doing its darndest to undo some of those changes and make things easier for the ISPs.

Don’t want to miss the best from Android Authority?

google preferred source badge light@2xgoogle preferred source badge dark@2x

In a new report, The Verge highlights the FCC’s proposal to “empower broadband consumers” by eliminating numerous billing and labeling requirements for broadband providers. Instead of directly benefiting consumers, though, the changes outlined appear structured solely to reduce the reporting burden on ISPs, allowing them to stop itemizing certain fees, dialing back requirements for displaying and archiving pricing labels, and no longer requiring that information be shared with customers over the phone.

Beyond the changes currently being proposed, the FCC also seeks comment on more anti-consumer measures, like doing away with multilingual requirements, or the extremely vague “further streamlining and eliminating any other label requirements that are unduly burdensome and provide minimal benefit to consumers.”

If that sounds like language that could be used to justify basically any change that’s good for ISPs and bad for their subscribers — well, that’s only because you’re reading it correctly.

None of this sound great, especially in the context of FCC Chairman Brendan Carr announcing his intent to reexamine broadband labeling in order to “separate the wheat from the chaff” — presumably further weakening the requirements for ISPs to present clear breakdowns of fees and pricing. Undoing pro-consumer regulations like those has been a stated goal of the current administration, and we would not be at all surprised to see such efforts continue and intensify.

What that’s going to mean the next time you purchase internet service, we can’t yet say, but maybe prepare yourself in advance for a little sticker shock.

Thank you for being part of our community. Read our Comment Policy before posting.



Source link

Releated Posts

Google’s ‘Disco’ experiment is an AI browser that turns your tabs into mini apps

What you need to know Google announces “Disco,” an AI-fueled browser experiment that leverages Gemini 3 for its…

ByByTDSNEWS999Dec 12, 2025

This is everything in Google Translate’s three big updates rolling out for Android

What you need to know Google announced an update for its Translate app on Android, bringing improved translations…

ByByTDSNEWS999Dec 12, 2025

Apple releases iOS 18.7.3 for iPhone, here’s what’s new

Apple has released two new iPhone software updates today. Alongside the launch of iOS 26.2, the company shipped…

ByByTDSNEWS999Dec 12, 2025

This weekend only, Best Buy is slashing $140 OFF the 2024 Kindle Scribe — but is the e-reader finally worth the price?

The New Year is swiftly approaching, and if you’re anything like me, your 2026 resolutions include getting back…

ByByTDSNEWS999Dec 12, 2025